1. REGULATIONS ON SOCIAL SECURITY  CONTRIBUTIONS, FOR UNEMPLOYMENT, PROTECTION IN THE EVENT OF THE CESSATION OF  ACTIVITY AND PROFESSIONAL TRAINING IN 2016
        Order ESS/70/2016 of  29 January developing the regulations on social security contributions, for unemployment,  protection in the event of the cessation of activity, the Salary Guarantee Fund  (FOGASA) and professional training, as provided by the 2016 Budget Law, sets  the contribution rates for occupational accidents and occupational diseases,  determines the contribution coefficients applicable to specific social security  arrangements, such as special agreements and collaboration agreements, among  others, and determines the payments that have to be made by mutual insurance  companies collaborating with the Social Security to the cost of shared services.
         
 back to 
          top
        2. SOCIAL SECURITY CONTRIBUTION BASES FOR  WORKERS IN GROUPS TWO AND THREE OF THE SPECIAL SYSTEM FOR MARITIME WORKERS 
        Order ESS/71/2016 of 29 January, which establishes the  social security contribution bases for employees in groups two and three of the  special system for maritime employees, sets the contribution bases for common  and professional contingencies for every province, fishing method and  professional category according to these employees’ average remuneration in  2015.
         
 back to 
          top
        3. EMPLOYERS MAY MONITOR EMPLOYEES’ PRIVATE  COMMUNICATIONS SENT USING COMPANY RESOURCES DURING WORKING HOURS
        The European Court  of Human Rights has ruled that companies may monitor their employees’ private  communications if sent using company resources during working hours. Companies  may invoke the private use of company resources as grounds for dismissal if they  have prohibited that use.
         
 back to 
          top
        4. APPLICABLE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING  AGREEMENT AT THE END OF THE AGREED TERM OF EXTENDED VALIDITY
        The Supreme Court has held that upon the expiry of the  extended term of a collective bargaining agreement, the applicable collective  bargaining agreement is that with a wider scope which includes regulation of  the same activities or employment relationships as the prior agreement.
         
 back to 
          top
        5. REDUCING EMPLOYEE DISCOUNTS ON A  SPECIFIC ITEM IS NOT A SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO WORKING CONDITIONS
        The Supreme Court has upheld a company’s decision to  reduce an employee discount on a specific item as it did not amount to a  substantial change to working conditions since the reduction did not cause  serious or significant harm to the employees.
         
 back to 
          top
        6. DAILY SNACK BREAK NOT TAKEN BY EMPLOYEES  MUST BE COMPENSATED AS ESTABLISHED IN THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT
        The Supreme Court has held that employees must be paid  for the extra time they work if they are unable to take their daily snack  breaks given that the breaks do not form part of their daily working hours (and  provided that the maximum annual working hours limit is not exceeded). The  financial compensation to be paid in this case was the proportional part of the  employees’ ordinary remuneration plus the amount set out in the applicable  collective bargaining agreement for employees who have not taken snack breaks.
         
 back to 
          top
        7. THE APPOINTMENT OF A THIRTEEN-MEMBER  COMMITTEE TO REPRESENT EMPLOYEES IN A CONSULTATION PERIOD IS LAWFUL
        The Supreme Court has held that, where the trade union  representatives who represent the majority of a company’s employees in the  works councils of the affected workplaces fail to reach an agreement, and  provided that there is no multi-plant workers’ committee, the committee that  must negotiate with the company’s management in a consultation period may have  a maximum of 13 members. The members are chosen in proportion to the number of  employees they represent.
         
 back to 
          top
        8. OBLIGATION TO NEGOTIATE TO REACH AN  AGREEMENT TO END A STRIKE DOES NOT APPLY TO THIRD PARTIES WHO DO NOT DIRECTLY  EMPLOY THE EMPLOYEES
        The National Court has held that the obligation for  employee representatives and employers to negotiate with each other to reach an  agreement to end a strike, laid down in article 8.2 of Royal Decree-Law 17/1977  of 4 March on labour relations, does not apply to third parties if the  employees involved in the strike are not their direct employees. In this  specific case a company had subcontracted other companies to provide it with  employees, who then went on strike.        
         
 back to 
          top